With that crappy flame paint job it's hard to tell It's too bad, it does apear to be a car that was cleaned up nice....then the the crappy flame job. I'd love to own it but I'd be tempeted to rattle can white over the flames before driving it home.
Yeah, I thought the flame job was kind of crappy too. If done right, it can look nice, like this one: http://www.myrideisme.com/Garage/DsFords/594
wow, m261398. i guess that's the difference between a crap job and a good job. i love the colour of blue he used. i dunno.. maybe it's something to do with me going senile but i like the wagons with flame jobs. they're so crappy and gauche that they're almost cute!
That's the very first thing I thought & said to myself too..."Oh Gawed, Stupid Flames". A nice, professionaly done flame job belongs on an old hot rod, not a station wagon. IMO of course.
I join the rest of you guys in saying, get those flames off of that wagon! I just don't see the allure that alot of people have for them. Like BFM says, they belong on a hot rod, like a chopped '32 Ford or something like that but not on a long roof.
I agree. Flame jobs look cool on a '32 duece, but not on a '66 Country Sedan. Same goes for the louvers.....