1965 Chrysler New Yorker wagon in FL

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965...5195828?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item3a7ffa08b4

Ebay auction for a '65 NY wagon. Pics are far too over-saturated, but they are still nice to show the overall condition.

NO reserve! It will be interesting to see where this goes.

 

65 chrysler

Another Lash car!!
They ALWAYS spray a TON of that black goop on the bottoms of their
cars. Personally, I'd rather see how much rust there is Before doing that
obvious cover-up

 

Who is Lash?

 

65 Chrysler

Anyone.... Anyone.... Buhler.... Buhler......
O.K. I got carried-away! Anyhow, according to some guys on this
board, that seller is known to be Less than honest about the cars
that they advertise. They actually sell under a few names now on
Ebay. And a matador that they had on Ebay, recently came-up again on
this forum. I mean if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, well.......

 

I agree! I have seen cars this person lists and I don't even have to see the name of the seller... if it says Florida and I see that undercarriage, I know who is selling it. lol. I don't even know the username of seller. lol.

 

This should have a 413 instead of a 440 (probably does, probably listed it wrong just as it says 1967 in the description).
It is completely missing the aluminum trim and ornament from between the tail lamps.
Seat reupholstery is totally wrong. The third seat shows the correct pattern.

But I'm glad it exists in any form, because dang, these are rare.

David

 

At least, when the ducks get naked, you know what you get.
It's one thing to doctor up images for an internet auction. However, if you're dealing with a set price and want to keep nitpickers from using minor blemishes to hold against you during price-bargaining, I don't think it's that deceitfull to throw a little make-up on your product to get potential customers to come over and at least look. Vehicles always look better in person, anyway

 

advert has a lot of NON info...
Says a lot about how to pay and whats expected in payment terms..

HOWEVER...

ZERO description of the car itself...
And as noted,, the info listed in totally INcorrect...

Its a 1965 car.. Last year for 413...
440 arrived in 1966....
And,, oh hell,, why bother...

 

Maybe I missed something somewhere? Where does he say that it's the original engine? As far as I've read, he says that only the body is original. What would be wrong with him replacing the 413 with something larger, as long as they look identicle to one another?
His:



...and another 65er for sale in AZ:

http://www.barrett-jackson.com/application/onlinesubmission/lotdetails.aspx?ln=641&aid=466

 

Hey, That guy in the tub looks like my neighbor, only with less clothes on.

 

Looks like it was sprayed over the original grease on everything underneath like was done on the third member.
Too many issues if you look close at every picture i.e. Left rear int. door panel by lock, interior work done, antifreeze on top of radiator neck and the diplomat, (or what ever those aluminum wheels are, have to go.

Chrysler wires would be to old for it but would look much better.

I wish I could find a loaded Chrysler on the west coast optioned like this one that was all original. I would be all over it. In any color. This one unfortunately looks like a quickie.

 

Does this mean if I want to sell one of my old cars I have to take it back to Illinois?:confused::confused:

 

106,000 mi maybe not 6000 worn out to bad on the break pedal on rt corner Motor pulled and painted probly not original. And if you wanna sell me a car don't go near it with undercoater! LOSER!

 

My, My.....is this another Trash by Lash car as someone pointed out??

 

The guy in the front or rear? Why not just print out the image, show it to him and ask him about seeing his bath toy collection?