81 Ford Durango

Discussion in 'Car & Truck Talk' started by yellerspirit, Dec 29, 2017.

  1. Leadslead

    Leadslead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2016
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Don't tell me if the Ranchero line continued it would have been this?
     
  2. yellerspirit

    yellerspirit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    19,511
    Likes Received:
    10,086
    Trophy Points:
    1,186
    Location:
    Canaan N.H.
  3. Silvertwinkiehobo

    Silvertwinkiehobo "Everything that breaks starts with 'F.'"

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    2,995
    Trophy Points:
    720
    Location:
    New Braunfels, TX
    No, it was a last-minute thing that was cobbled together. There was supposed to be a Ranchero from the downsized-full sized LTD wagon, but Ford nixed it after building one body buck. The prevailing theory put forth in a Ranchero history book is that with tighter economy and emission standards, Ford couldn't justify building them.
     
  4. Krash Kadillak

    Krash Kadillak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    21,093
    Likes Received:
    2,056
    Trophy Points:
    798
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Springfield, Oregon
    Yes, there were some compromises with the design.

    Keep in mind that in 1981, when the Durango came out, the Chevy El Camino was still being sold in pretty good numbers - over 45,000 min the 1980 model year. The last year for Ranchero production was 1979.

    The idea to make a new 'Ranchero' was most likely generated externally, from the private firm that converted them. Maybe they saw the potential in the overall shape of the Fairmont Futura coupe:
    [​IMG]

    The kicker is the roof line - cut off the rear portion of the roof, along with the quarter windows, cut off the package tray reinforcement between the quarter panels, and you have a huge open area to drop in a pre-formed fiberglas insert. The tail gate was the most difficult part of the whole project. Easy to see what was done, but not that easy to actually execute.
     
  5. Silvertwinkiehobo

    Silvertwinkiehobo "Everything that breaks starts with 'F.'"

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    2,995
    Trophy Points:
    720
    Location:
    New Braunfels, TX
    Yeah, I understand about the design, and, to be sure, using the wagon tail lights and hatch (how they would've had to do it to make it work) would've likely been cost-prohibitive. But is that any excuse for making a crappy compromise?
     
  6. Krash Kadillak

    Krash Kadillak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    21,093
    Likes Received:
    2,056
    Trophy Points:
    798
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Springfield, Oregon
    For any aftermarket vehicle modification like this, the cost of the conversion has to be as low as possible - otherwise you would price yourself right out of any sales. Don't know what the target price was for a Durango, but with the exclusivity factor, I would guess at something around $1,000 over the price of a loaded wagon. Dealers could try to mark it up more, but you have to have conservative estimations.

    A full-size truck needs to have the tail ights exposed when the tailgate is down - that's something that could happen quite a lot. The Durango is a very light-duty truck - i don't think it had any modifications to the rear suspension to allow increased load capacity. They most likely decided that tail gate conversion was the best solution. To 'show' the tail lights with the gate open would have entailed manufacturing a whole new (smaller) tail light unit, and maybe some new filler panel for the lower gate itself.
     

Share This Page