1975 Chevrolet Laguna Type S-3

Discussion in 'Car & Truck Talk' started by jwdtenn, Mar 29, 2019.

  1. jwdtenn

    jwdtenn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    1,414
    Trophy Points:
    746
    Location:
    Nashville
  2. cammerjeff

    cammerjeff Longroofs Rule!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    947
    Trophy Points:
    427
    Location:
    Belleville, MI
    It is a good looking car, but the things I can pick out as incorrect are the black bumper rub strips, only the lighter colored S3's got them, the darker colors got white rubs strips to better match the side stripes, the rear bumper should be chrome, I am assuming a non numbers matching engine as the ad states "period correct 400 engine" also for the asking price I would expect all the little things in the interior to be in better shape, like the seat belts, turn signal & tilt column stalk chrome, & missing shoulderharness retainers.

    All that being said I have always liked these models. Very few had the bucket seats, center console with floor shift, or a bigger engine than a 350 2bbl. This one even has a gauge package.
     
  3. Brad

    Brad Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    87
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Ohio
    A good friend of mine had the opposite of this one....white with cranberry stripes, cranberry half vinyl roof, cranberry interior with swivel buckets, console, completely loaded out. 400 4bbl too but had AC unlike this one. Absolutely beautiful car, in fact I really wanted one back in the day. Performance was lacking back in the mid-70's and, believe it or not, my '75 Skyhawk with the 231 V6 2bbl 4speed would keep up with his 400 4bbl to about 95-100 mph. After that, he would pull away. We nick-named him "Baa-Wooooo" as he flipped the air cleaner lid over and we all know what sound a quadrajet makes when one does that "modification"....LOL!

    While a neat car, I personally don't feel it is worth the asking price. I agree with you Jeff, too many little details need too much work. One could easily drop another $5000 in getting the details worked out.
     
  4. 60Mercman

    60Mercman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2018
    Messages:
    5,679
    Likes Received:
    1,930
    Trophy Points:
    512
    Wagon Garage:
    12
    Not so sure I wouldn’t have taken $11,700 for it. By ‘75 those really weren’t considered “muscle” cars. I guess gaged against the other standards of ‘75 they may have been, but still.
     
  5. cammerjeff

    cammerjeff Longroofs Rule!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    947
    Trophy Points:
    427
    Location:
    Belleville, MI
    I would have taken the $11,700 for it, but the owner/restorer may have twice that into it.
     
  6. 60Mercman

    60Mercman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2018
    Messages:
    5,679
    Likes Received:
    1,930
    Trophy Points:
    512
    Wagon Garage:
    12
    No doubt you are probably on to something there. I think maybe 30 years ago you could make money flipping cars. Today with a good paint job in the 2-5,000 and up area and just with what stuff costs I don’t know unless you buy a rare car dirt cheap it’s hard to make a bundle of money on them. I love these ads on EBay for ‘55 chopped tinkle yellow Chevy’s where the guy will say “over $100,000 invested”. Ah sorry. I’m not paying for your tastes. It’s kinda a crap shoot. A restoration friend told me once. “The paint doesn’t know whether it’s going on a Ford Maverick, or a Packard. It all costs the same”. Seemed to make sense at the time.
     

Share This Page