just 'cause you can doesn't mean you should: '71 VW Beetle morphed into a Porsche?

I can see this would make an interesting Transformer toy, but a car? Not so much.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Volkswagen-...a894cdeca&item=251411619530&pt=US_Cars_Trucks

 

Maybe not !

 

Fugly, but different I suppose???

 

"Just 'cause you can doesn't mean you should: '71 VW Beetle morphed into a Porsche?"

Exactly...........

 

What a waste of time, money and a Volkswagen.

 

-----^^^^^^Well worded----^^^^^

But don't take offense. We may be wrong. It would be a boring world if everyone had the same ideas and built only one type car....say like a 32 Ford. I've seen so many 1932 Fords that I'm beginning to hate them.
But if someone gave me a nice one I'd probably suffer through it and drive the thing. On the other hand, maybe not this VWsche.

 

I just have to wonder about the weight distribution of this car. A Chevy V6 engine with most of the engine weight behind the rear axle?

"Less than 100 of these body kits were manufactured" Probably for good reason.

 

This was a kit? Does that mean there may be another 80 or 90 out there?

 

" $ 9000 invested"
Great investment!

 

LOVE the Cavalier tail lamps, too. Maybe that is where the V-6 is from. Hmmmmm. Makes sense, after all, that engine was designed to hang out past the axle, just the FRONT axle, not the rear.

 

We all get lost from time to time so I tried a cup of tea and it did not work , Bugger its still an unhappy Dub so I tried a few and it still looks sad so at this time of day this Dud look like Crapo to me perhaps some more and no nothing its still the Bloody same maybe it til be gone by New Year Hic

 

That is vomalicious.

 

My thoughts exactly.

 

Wrong engine in the wrong place. The solution:

I'd rather have a Toronado mill in my back seat:



Ghias are better to hide Toro mills in: